[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130502171951.GV14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 18:19:51 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@...glegroups.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/3] net: velocity: Add platform device support to
VIA velocity driver
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:04:50AM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz> :
> [...]
> > +static int velocity_remove(void *pdev, enum velocity_bus_type bustype)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *netdev;
> > + struct velocity_info *vptr;
> > + int pci = (bustype == BUS_PCI) ? 1 : 0;
> > +
> > + if (pci)
> > + netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + else
> > + netdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> The caller knows how to retrieve the net_device pointer, whence
> the struct velocity_info pointer, whence any bustype dependent
> function pointer to alleviate the "if (pci)" and CONFIG stuff.
>
> If you are not convinced, please consider turning the void *
> into an union *.
The other thing here is that you can just pass a struct device into
these and retrieve the same driver data via:
netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
as:
static inline void *platform_get_drvdata(const struct platform_device *pdev)
{
return dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
}
static inline void *pci_get_drvdata(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
return dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
}
So there's no need for void * or union nonsense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists