[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305021816490.5398@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 18:20:32 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce
psci_smp_ops
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > ping
>
> Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree?
I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc
tree, after Russell acks them.
The ping is for Russell to ack them and Arnd to merge them.
> If so, might be
> worth sending a pull request to linux+pull@....linux.org.uk.
>
> Has this been in -next?
Yes they have, because I temporarily added them to my branch in
linux-next.
In fact Stephen found and solved a merge conflict here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136722292031420&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists