| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 16:01:56 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Remove DMA address look-up table On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote: > DMA addresses are now passed as part of the dmaengine API by invoking > dmaengine_slave_config(). So there's no requirement for the DMA40 > driver to look them up in a table provided by platform data. This > method does not fit in well using Device Tree either. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> This goes on top of some other changes right? Right now the DMA series is confusing me a bit, there is these 6 patches: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136698179306642&w=2 Then these 5 patches: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136740201416293&w=2 And then this single patch. Where shall I start, i.e. which patches go first? Can they all be combined into one big series? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists