[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130503140949.GN24153@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:09:49 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: Remove DMA address look-up table
On Fri, 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > DMA addresses are now passed as part of the dmaengine API by invoking
> > dmaengine_slave_config(). So there's no requirement for the DMA40
> > driver to look them up in a table provided by platform data. This
> > method does not fit in well using Device Tree either.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> This goes on top of some other changes right?
>
> Right now the DMA series is confusing me a bit, there is
> these 6 patches:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136698179306642&w=2
>
> Then these 5 patches:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=136740201416293&w=2
>
> And then this single patch.
Right. I can prepare one big branch if you like.
> Where shall I start, i.e. which patches go first?
>
> Can they all be combined into one big series?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists