linux-kernel - Re: [linux-next-20130422] Bug in SLAB?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000013e7f60169e-47b0bd92-a757-41da-8b30-fa78511fe298-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 May 2013 14:23:23 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
cc:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next-20130422] Bug in SLAB?

On Mon, 6 May 2013, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> > -       for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i < KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++)
>
> This didn't match what I had in my tree. I fixed it by hand but please
> verify the end result:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git/commit/?h=slab/next&id=8a965b3baa89ffedc73c0fbc750006c631012ced
>
Well this is because you did not take the patch that changed the way
KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH is treated.

The patch above looks fine though.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/