[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130509135017.GD3200@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:50:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: Add API to wait for deferred probe to
complete during init
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 12:50:46PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> However, if a device that shuts down resources after init has
> completed and then cannot turn those resources back on when another
> driver requests them then it sounds like there is a bigger design
> problem. We're in a hotplug world and most of the time a driver cannot
> assume that a resource will never get requested after initcalls have
> completed. It sounds like a design bug in the driver if it cannot
> handle that use case.
Even if the driver copes fine it can still be desirable to avoid the
power down/up cycle if it involves some user visible effect - things
like blinking the display off then on for example. That said I am a
little suspicious about this approach, it doesn't feel as robust as it
should to go round individual callers.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists