[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518B1D00.5030700@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 20:50:24 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate
On 05/08/2013 04:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/19/13 09:28, James Hogan wrote:
>> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent
>> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate
>> to that requested. It can be controlled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX flag
>> so that it doesn't happen unless explicitly allowed.
>>
>> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to
>> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to
>> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in
>> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation.
>
> Which tree is this based on? I get failures with git am on patch 2.
>
Mike's clk-for-3.10 branch.
-Saravana
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists