linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <518B663D.60806@imgtec.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 May 2013 10:02:53 +0100
From:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate

On 09/05/13 00:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/19/13 09:28, James Hogan wrote:
>> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent
>> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate
>> to that requested. It can be controlled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX flag
>> so that it doesn't happen unless explicitly allowed.
>>
>> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to
>> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to
>> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in
>> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation.
> 
> Which tree is this based on? I get failures with git am on patch 2.
> 

It was based on v3.9-rc4.

Cheers
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/