[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518BFD99.2010208@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 12:48:41 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate
On 05/09/13 02:02, James Hogan wrote:
> On 09/05/13 00:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 04/19/13 09:28, James Hogan wrote:
>>> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent
>>> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate
>>> to that requested. It can be controlled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX flag
>>> so that it doesn't happen unless explicitly allowed.
>>>
>>> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to
>>> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to
>>> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in
>>> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation.
>> Which tree is this based on? I get failures with git am on patch 2.
>>
> It was based on v3.9-rc4.
>
Thanks. Would it be possible for you to update to Mike's for-next
branch? I've done the rebase myself for now and it seems to work well
enough. I'll need to add the set_rate_and_parent() op on top.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists