[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADGdYn7Hm6EXvgK_ih_T8eE1oxzeiHimpZJ2LvQvCvC=ycmddg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 07:52:18 +0530
From: amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/21] thermal: exynos: Fix to clear only the generated interrupts
Hi,
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Eduardo Valentin
<eduardo.valentin@...com> wrote:
> On 07-05-2013 09:01, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote:
>> This patch uses the TMU status register to know the generated interrupts
>> and only clear them in the interrupt handler.
>>
>> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 10 ++++------
>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> index 97b87aa..082d5a2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>> @@ -325,17 +325,15 @@ static void exynos_tmu_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> struct exynos_tmu_data, irq_work);
>> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata = data->pdata;
>> struct exynos_tmu_registers *reg = pdata->registers;
>> + unsigned int val_irq;
>>
>> exynos_report_trigger();
>> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
>> clk_enable(data->clk);
>>
>> - if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS)
>> - writel((reg->inten_rise_mask << reg->inten_rise_shift) |
>> - (reg->inten_fall_mask << reg->inten_fall_shift),
>> - data->base + reg->tmu_intclear);
>> - else
>> - writel(reg->inten_rise_mask, data->base + reg->tmu_intclear);
>> + val_irq = readl(data->base + reg->tmu_intstat);
>> + /* clear the interrupts */
>> + writel(val_irq, data->base + reg->tmu_intclear);
>>
>
> hmmm.. Don t you need to act accordingly depending on what is in your
> int status?
Earlier also it is done like this way. Basically core thermal layer
checks temp for each trip so even if I check for which threshold
interrupt is raised it is of no use. Anyway this is a TODO for me.
Thanks,
Amit Daniel
>
>> clk_disable(data->clk);
>> mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
>> index 3a1ded1..7322597 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos4210_tmu_registers = {
>> .inten_rise1_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE1_SHIFT,
>> .inten_rise2_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE2_SHIFT,
>> .inten_rise3_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE3_SHIFT,
>> + .tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT,
>> .tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR,
>> };
>> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data const exynos4210_default_tmu_data = {
>> @@ -111,6 +112,7 @@ static struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = {
>> .inten_rise2_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE2_SHIFT,
>> .inten_rise3_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_RISE3_SHIFT,
>> .inten_fall0_shift = EXYNOS_TMU_INTEN_FALL0_SHIFT,
>> + .tmu_intstat = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTSTAT,
>> .tmu_intclear = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_INTCLEAR,
>> .emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON,
>> .emul_temp_shift = EXYNOS_EMUL_DATA_SHIFT,
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists