linux-kernel - Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPkEcwi7J8U_pUKCVBwrpLVauddokTytcq=PUqSSkUELdUiatg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 May 2013 11:35:45 -0700
From:	james northrup <northrup.james@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips@...il.com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tux3@...3.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?

also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds
that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific
misconduct, not error

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daniel Phillips
<daniel.raymond.phillips@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the catch - I should indeed have noted that "modified
> dbench" was used for this benchmark, thus amplifying Tux3's advantage
> in delete performance. This literary oversight does not make the
> results any less interesting: we beat Tmpfs on that particular load.
> Beating tmpfs at anything is worthy of note. Obviously, all three
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/