lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5034672.tljvClO7po@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 01:27:26 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages

On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:08:30 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 91ddfd6..9ced5c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -379,23 +379,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>  	u32 flags, base_flags;
>  	bool is_osc_granted = false;
> +	acpi_handle hdl = device->handle;

The usual way is to call it 'handle'.  Any reason why not to do it here too?

>  	root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!root)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	segment = 0;
> -	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
> -				       &segment);
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, &segment);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
> +		acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>  		result = -ENODEV;
>  		goto end;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check _CRS first, then _BBN.  If no _BBN, default to zero. */
>  	root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> -	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
> +	status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(hdl, &root->secondary);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  		 * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>  		 */
>  		root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
> -		       "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> -		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
> +		acpi_handle_warn(hdl,
> +				 FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
> +		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>  					       NULL, &bus);
>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>  			root->secondary.start = bus;
>  		else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>  			root->secondary.start = 0;
>  		else {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
> +			acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>  			result = -ENODEV;
>  			goto end;
>  		}
> @@ -425,11 +425,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = root;
>  
> -	printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
> +	pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>  	       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
>  	       root->segment, &root->secondary);
>  
> -	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
> +	root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(hdl);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  		dev_info(&device->dev,
>  			"Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>  
> -		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
> +		status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(hdl, &flags,
>  				       OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
>  		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>  			is_osc_granted = true;
> @@ -505,9 +505,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  	 */
>  	root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>  	if (!root->bus) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
> -			    "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> -			    root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> +		acpi_handle_err(hdl,
> +			"Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> +			root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>  		result = -ENODEV;
>  		goto end;
>  	}
> @@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>  		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
>  			pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
>  	} else {
> -		pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
> -			"disabling ASPM\n");
> +		acpi_handle_info(hdl,
> +			"ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>  		pcie_no_aspm();
>  	}
>  
> @@ -571,12 +571,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
>  	struct acpi_device *device;
>  
>  	if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "acpi device exists...\n");

Do we have acpi_handle_dbg()?  If so, why don't you use it here? (And below.)
If not, why don't you add it and use it here (and below)?

>  		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
> +		acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>  }
>  
>  static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
> @@ -602,7 +603,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>  static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
>  	struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
>  	acpi_handle handle;
>  	u32 type;
> @@ -613,13 +613,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>  
> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>  		/* bus enumerate */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>  		if (!root)
>  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>  
> @@ -627,27 +625,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
>  		/* device check */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>  		if (!root)
>  			handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>  		/* request device eject */
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
> -				 (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
>  		if (root)
>  			handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
> -				 type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> +		acpi_handle_warn(handle,
> +			 "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%xn", type);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
>  	kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
> -	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>  }
>  
>  static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
> @@ -661,9 +658,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
>  find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>  {
>  	acpi_status status;
> -	char objname[64];
> -	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
> -				      .pointer = objname };
>  	int *count = (int *)context;
>  
>  	if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
> @@ -671,16 +665,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>  
>  	(*count)++;
>  
> -	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> -
>  	status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
>  					handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> -				  objname, (unsigned int)status);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +			"notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
> +			 (unsigned int)status);
>  	else
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
> -				 objname);
> +		acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
> +				   "notify handler is installed\n");
>  
>  	return AE_OK;
>  }

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ