linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5191E4E0.7020505@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 08:16:48 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
CC:	Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again

On 05/14/2013 05:36 AM, joeyli wrote:
> I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
> zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.
> 
> Did this patch move to other branch?

It appears I dropped this patch when doing the rebase against -rc1. I'm
really sorry about that. I've applied it again.

Thanks for being so diligent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/