linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1368506197.21417.172.camel@linux-s257.site>
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 12:36:37 +0800
From:	joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Cc:	Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efivarfs: Never return ENOENT from firmware again

Hi Matt, 

於 一，2013-05-13 於 20:21 +0100，Matt Fleming 提到：
> On 05/10/2013 11:29 AM, Lingzhu Xiang wrote:
> > Previously in 1fa7e69 efi_status_to_err() translated firmware status
> > EFI_NOT_FOUND to -EIO instead of -ENOENT for efivarfs operations to
> > avoid confusion. After refactoring in e14ab23, it is also used in other
> > places where the translation may be unnecessary.
> > 
> > So move the translation to efivarfs specific code. Also return EOF
> > for reading zero-length files, which is what users would expect.
> > 
> > Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
> > Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@...e.com>
> > Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > This is to be applied against mainline or Matt Fleming's chainsaw branch.
> 
> Applied, thanks.
> 
> FYI, I rebased my 'urgent' branch on v3.10-rc1, so your patch now
> applies there too.
> 
> 

I found the "[PATCH] x86, efi: initial the local variable of DataSize to
zero" lost in urgent branch, and it also didn't in Linus's v3.10-rc1.

Did this patch move to other branch?


Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/