linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 resend] cpufreq: Raname index as data in cpufreq_frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpo=MS6D9DGiZDUPPYA47c=tqWXUMC6bdssD5xL=7GEcDvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 19:16:29 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@....com, arvind.chauhan@....com,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 resend] cpufreq: Raname index as data in cpufreq_frequency_table

On 13 May 2013 21:57, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 06:57 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> "Index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never index and isn't used
>> at all by cpufreq core. And is only useful for cpufreq drivers for their
>> personal use.
>>
>> Many people now a days blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption
>> that core is using it for some work.
>>
>> This patch renames it to "data" as that's what its purpose it. All users of the
>> same are fixed too.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
>
>> -/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */
>> +/* Frequency table data must be sequential starting at 0 */
>
> I assume that comment is due to the assumption you're trying to remove.
> Should the comment be removed/corrected now? Perhaps the .data field
> isn't even needed any more in this driver?
>
>>  static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>>       { 0, 216000 },
>>       { 1, 312000 },

This must address your concerns:
@Rafael: I have attached both patches now for you to apply.

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:08:50 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove irrelevant comment

Tegra cpufreq driver doesn't use .index field of cpufreq_frequency_table and so
comment mentioning order of .index is irrelevant. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
index c74c0e1..293ed2c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/suspend.h>

-/* Frequency table index must be sequential starting at 0 */
 static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
 	{ 0, 216000 },
 	{ 1, 312000 },

Download attachment "0001-cpufreq-tegra-Remove-irrelevant-comment.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (1019 bytes)

Download attachment "0002-cpufreq-Raname-index-as-data-in-cpufreq_frequency_ta.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (55433 bytes)