[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B723B@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:38:44 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
<hein_tibosch@...oo.es>, <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
<michal.simek@...inx.com>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
"Havard Skinnemoen" <havard@...nnemoen.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3 v3] net/macb: Try to optimize struct macb layout
> Move TX-related fields to the top of the struct so that they end up on
> the same cache line. Move the NAPI struct below that since it is used
> from the interrupt handler. This field is also marked as
> ___cacheline_aligned_in_smp.
> RX-related fields go below those.
> Function pointers and capability mask are immediately after that as
> they are also used in the hot path.
>
> Move the spinlock before regs since they are usually used together.
Haven't you introduced some holes in the structure?
I suspect that spinloack_t might only be 32bits on
some 64bit systems.
There is certainly one where 'caps' used to be.
...>
> struct macb {
> + spinlock_t lock;
> void __iomem *regs;
...
> + struct macb_or_gem_ops macbgem_ops;
> +
> + u32 caps;
>
> - spinlock_t lock;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists