[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A46608.2020906@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 10:08:40 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
<hein_tibosch@...oo.es>, <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
<michal.simek@...inx.com>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
Havard Skinnemoen <havard@...nnemoen.net>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v3] net/macb: Try to optimize struct macb layout
On 15/05/2013 11:37, David Laight :
>> From: Havard Skinnemoen <havard@...nnemoen.net>
>
>> Move the NAPI struct below that since it is used
>> from the interrupt handler. This field is also marked as
>> ___cacheline_aligned_in_smp.
>
> Is that a good idea if the cache line size is 256 bytes?
> Indeed is that ever sane - except for a few special structures
> that really need it, and are guaranteed to be allocated
> with that much alignment.
I do not know if that was really needed, it was a recommendation by Ben.
(previous email here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1887101/
)
Anyway, it seems that this patch needs more work whereas the others of
the series are not commented.
So maybe, I can resend patches 1, 2 for making this big enhancement go
forward (as it is in review process for quite a long time...).
David, do you want me to resend or can you retrieve these v3 patches in
patchwork?
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists