[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1368612357.15764.26.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:05:57 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] mtd: add datasheet's ECC information to
nand_chip{}
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:40 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> 1.) Why add the ECC information to the nand_chip{} ?
> Each nand chip has its requirement for the ECC correctability, such as
> "4bit ECC for each 512Byte" or "40bit ECC for each 1024Byte".
> This ECC info is very important to the nand controller, such as gpmi.
>
> Take the Micron MT29F64G08CBABA for example, its geometry is
> 8k page size, 744 bytes oob size and it requires 40bit ECC per 1K bytes.
> If we do not provide the ECC info to the gpmi nand driver, it has to
> calculate the ECC correctability itself. The gpmi driver will gets the 56bit
> ECC for per 1K bytes which is beyond its BCH's 40bit ecc capibility.
> The gpmi will quits in this case. But in actually, the gpmi can supports
> this nand chip if it can get the right ECC info.
Thanks. Brian has disappeared, may be busy, but I would still like to
wait for his response. At the very least, I would like to make sure he
does not object.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists