[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130517110241.GI1627@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 12:02:41 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Cc: Philip Balister <philip@...ister.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] clk: Introduce userspace clock driver
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:55:45AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:26:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The binding should obviously be defined as a set of clocks rather than a
> > single clock - something like how we specify regulators on PMICs
> > probably makes sense. Each clock can have its own properties.
> For a device driver as clock consumer, the bindings etc. are well
> defined. Just add the 'clocks' and 'clock-names' props and use the CCF.
That's not really intended to be used for enumeration by the child,
though - you'd at least need to define that the child looks through
the same binding to figure out what clocks to request.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists