[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130520014506.GA2201@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 18:45:06 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Consult] Why need we call device_remove_file() firstly before
call device_unregister() ?
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 09:03:27AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 07:06 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
> >> Hello All:
> >>
> >> I searched 'arch/*' and 'drivers/*' sub-directory, all of them are 'obey
> >> this rule', even in device_unregister() itself, it also firstly calls
> >> device_remove_file(), then call kobject_del().
> >>
> >> But after read the related code (fs/sysfs/*, drivers/base/core.c), it
> >> seems kobject_del() -> sysfs_remove_dir() which will release all related
> >> things (can instead of device_remove_file()).
> >>
> >> So in fact, we need not call device_remove_file() before call
> >> device_unregister(), is it correct ?
> >
> > Looks it is correct but it is a bit implicit.
> >
>
> If really no other members reply within a week, we should treat your
> opinion (or suggestion) as the final result conclusion within
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org. :-)
I have no idea what you mean by this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists