[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4603632.xLpXUpmrfP@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:26:30 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"fabian@...ter-vogt.de Vogt" <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>,
Lionel Debroux <lionel_debroux@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3 3/6] clk: Add TI-Nspire clock drivers
On Monday 20 May 2013 21:19:33 Daniel Tang wrote:
> On 20/05/2013, at 5:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 19 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote:
> >> If the vendors for the on-SOC components are unknown, should we just
> >> leave the compatible strings as is (i.e. "nspire-XXX")?
> >
> > In that case, I would use the name of the company that made the SoC.
> > I believe someone mentioned it was made by LSI logic.
>
> Yep, that's right. So "lsi,nspire-XXX" should be fine?
I wouldn't use that combination, since lsi did not make the nspire.
For anything on the LSI chip, "lsi,zevio-XXX" would be correct,
or maybe "lsi,zevio1020-XXX" for something specific to a particular
SoC variant. For off-SoC parts, "ti,nspire-XXX" would be right,
or "ti,nspire-cx-XXX" if you care about the model.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists