linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1369059993.3301.174.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 07:26:33 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against
 spraying attacks

On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 16:19 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:

> What about emitting additional instructions at random locations in the
> generated code itself?
> 
> Eg., after every instruction, have random chance to insert
> 'xor $0xcc,%al; xor $0xcc,%al', etc?

This will be the latest thing I'll do.

Frankly, whole point of BPF JIT is speed.

If we have slow code, just use the interpretor instead.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/