[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130520.232619.964940909999914694.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: libo.chen@...wei.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, samuel@...tiz.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, khc@...waw.pl,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, balbi@...com,
sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
brudley@...adcom.com, thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] driver:usb&net: add missing platform_driver owner
From: Libo Chen <libo.chen@...wei.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:42:00 +0800
> I find a lot of mistakes using struct platform_driver without owner.
> So I pick up some of them including usb and net modules
Instead of doing it this way, which is obviously error prone and
easy to forget, make platform_driver_register() be a macro which
sets the module owner field then calls the real __platform_driver_register().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists