[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130521084108.1a585f32@skate>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:41:08 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: libo.chen@...wei.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
samuel@...tiz.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu, khc@...waw.pl,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, balbi@...com,
sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
brudley@...adcom.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] driver:usb&net: add missing platform_driver owner
Dear David Miller,
On Mon, 20 May 2013 23:26:19 -0700 (PDT), David Miller wrote:
> From: Libo Chen <libo.chen@...wei.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:42:00 +0800
>
> > I find a lot of mistakes using struct platform_driver without owner.
> > So I pick up some of them including usb and net modules
>
> Instead of doing it this way, which is obviously error prone and
> easy to forget, make platform_driver_register() be a macro which
> sets the module owner field then calls the real
> __platform_driver_register().
Or, maybe make the existing module_platform_driver() macro do this?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists