linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500-ext: Don't register without initialisation data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 12:45:16 -0500
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500-ext: Don't register without
 initialisation data

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:53:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> > running or not, the worst that should happen is that the state can be
> > read back.  I'd therefore expect the fix here to be in the board side
> > code that enables the regulators.

> It's both.

> From the platform side we have stopped passing the external regulator
> driver's constraints for Snowball:

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/22/280

> All I've done here is stop the ext driver from crapping out with the
> misleading error "Configuration error: size mismatch", because a)
> it's not an error, it's expected and b) It's not a size mismatch,
> instead we have chosen to keep the constraints back in the Snowball
> (and u8505) case.

OK, so the regulator driver is buggy and insisting on having constraints
passed in for every regulator then?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)