[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130523070905.GD18714@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:09:05 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500-ext: Don't register without
initialisation data
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:53:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 May 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > running or not, the worst that should happen is that the state can be
> > > read back. I'd therefore expect the fix here to be in the board side
> > > code that enables the regulators.
>
> > It's both.
>
> > From the platform side we have stopped passing the external regulator
> > driver's constraints for Snowball:
>
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/22/280
>
> > All I've done here is stop the ext driver from crapping out with the
> > misleading error "Configuration error: size mismatch", because a)
> > it's not an error, it's expected and b) It's not a size mismatch,
> > instead we have chosen to keep the constraints back in the Snowball
> > (and u8505) case.
>
> OK, so the regulator driver is buggy and insisting on having constraints
> passed in for every regulator then?
If that's not how it's meant to work then, yes.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists