linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500-ext: Don't register without initialisation data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdacteTbFkOQ9w3LQCwN+RDviK04j77itz7uyTiY56+nCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 May 2013 10:23:43 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500-ext: Don't register without
 initialisation data

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c b/drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c
>> > index b4d4547..8421537 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/ab8500-ext.c
>> > @@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ int ab8500_ext_regulator_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >                 return -EINVAL;
>> >         }
>> >
>> > +       /* have any external regulators been specified? */
>> > +       if (pdata->num_ext_regulator == 0) {
>> > +               dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Not using external regulators\n");
>> > +               return 0;
>> > +       }
>>
>> dev_warn() is really when we warn about something really nasty, worse
>> than dev_err(). It seems dev_info() is more apropriate.
>
> Are you confusing it with dev_crit()?
>
> This is how the levels are defined, and "warning" is less urgent than "error":

Yeah :-/

But I still think this should be just dev_info().

No big deal though.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/