[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNO9FeCaJ_YFbvPMUHOBjneLqqW+ucYprZb7884Eth-DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:45:29 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: microcode loading got really slow.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
>
> No, f/w loader always fall back to user mode helper, as long as its
> support is built in. And doing that for microcode driver in that code
> path isn't only superfluous but also broken due to request_firmware
> call in module init.
Firstly, it is not good to do this since some distributions doesn't support
direct loading and doesn't have udevd(such as, android).
Secondly, returning failure from request_firmware_direct() doesn't mean
the firmware doesn't exist since distribution may put the firmware other where.
Anyway, this example is very specific(no firmware can be accepted), and
request_firmware_nowait() should be OK for the situation.
>
>> wrt. this problem, I think we
>> need to know why the direct loading is failed.
>
> The reason is obvious: the requested f/w file doesn't exist.
> And it's fine, because the microcode update is an optional operation.
> If no f/w file is found, it's not handled as an error. It just means
> that no need to update, continuing to work.
OK, as said above, the example is very specific, and might be
workarounded by request_firmware_nowait().
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists