[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013ed1b8d0cc-ad2bb878-51bd-430c-8159-629b23ed1b44-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:09:10 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
trinity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOPS in perf_mmap_close()
On Thu, 23 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Right it doesn't. I think the easiest solution for now is to not copy the VMA
> on fork().
Right. Pinned pages are not inherited. If a page is unpinned then that is
going to happen for all address spaces that reference the page.
> But I totally missed patch bc3e53f682d that introduced pinned_vm, AFAICT that
> also wrecked some accounting. We should still account both against
> RLIMIT_MEMLOCK.
The point of the patch was to unwreck accounting. Before the patch mlocked
pages were counted twice which resulted in stramge VM scenarios where more
pages were mlocked than memory available. Note that a pinned page may also
be mlocked.
Simply adding the two will reintroduce the problems that were fixed by the
patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists