[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130526180933.GA20270@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 20:09:33 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 3/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Disable memory hotremove for
32bit
On Sun 26-05-13 07:58:42, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >> As KOSAKI Motohiro mentioned, memory hotplug don't support 32bit since
> >> it was born,
> >
> > Why? any reference? This reasoning is really weak.
>
> I have no seen any highmem support in memory hotplug code and I don't think this
> patch fixes all 32bit highmem issue. If anybody are interesting to
> support it, it is good thing. But in fact, _now_ it is broken when
> enable HIGHMEM.
> So, I just want to mark broken until someone want to support highmem
> and verify overall.
>
> And, yes, this patch is no good. Kconfig doesn't describe why disable
> when highmem.
> So,
>
> depends on 64BIT || !HIGHMEM || BROKEN
>
> maybe clear documentation more.
I have no objection to disbale the feature for HIGHMEM configurations I
was merely complaining that the patch didn't describe _why_.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists