linux-kernel - Re: [patch v2 3/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Disable memory hotremove for 32bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51A2868E.4030905@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 May 2013 18:02:54 -0400
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 3/6] mm/memory_hotplug: Disable memory hotremove for
 32bit

(5/26/13 2:09 PM), Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 26-05-13 07:58:42, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>>> As KOSAKI Motohiro mentioned, memory hotplug don't support 32bit since
>>>> it was born,
>>>
>>> Why? any reference? This reasoning is really weak.
>>
>> I have no seen any highmem support in memory hotplug code and I don't think this
>> patch fixes all 32bit highmem issue. If anybody are interesting to
>> support it, it is good thing. But in fact, _now_ it is broken when
>> enable HIGHMEM.
>> So, I just want to mark broken until someone want to support highmem
>> and verify overall.
>>
>> And, yes, this patch is no good. Kconfig doesn't describe why disable
>> when highmem.
>> So,
>>
>> depends on 64BIT || !HIGHMEM || BROKEN
>>
>> maybe clear documentation more.
> 
> I have no objection to disbale the feature for HIGHMEM configurations I
> was merely complaining that the patch didn't describe _why_.

No worry. I withdrew the claim because several people now willing to contribute
32bit highmem improvement. I don't want to block them.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/