[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <69E1F2A1-CD4C-4B16-8664-6010C7217B8B@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 20:56:24 +1000
From: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"fabian@...ter-vogt.de Vogt" <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>,
Lionel Debroux <lionel_debroux@...oo.fr>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv4 4/6] clocksource: TI-Nspire timer support
On 27/05/2013, at 8:53 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Add clocksource and clockevent driver for the TI-Nspire.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>
>
> This is *much* improved :-D
Awesome!
>> + /* Disable timer interrupts */
>> + writel(0, timer->interrupt_regs + IO_INTR_MSK);
>> + writel(TIMER_INTR_ALL, timer->interrupt_regs + IO_INTR_ACK);
>> + /* Stop timer */
>> + writel(CNTL_STOP_TIMER, timer->timer1 + IO_CONTROL);
>> + dev->mode = mode;
>> + break;
>> + }
>
> Surely both the compiler and checkpatch is complaining that this
> switch does not contain a default: clause?
Neither in fact. checkpatch.pl gives me a all-clear.
But, I'll clean it up anyway - seems cleaner that way XD.
>
> If you fix this you can add my:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Cheers,
Daniel Tang--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists