[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A39A3F.8080903@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:39:11 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: atomlin@...hat.com
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pshelar@...ira.com, mst@...hat.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
aquini@...hat.com, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] skbuff: Hide GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures for
dropped packets
On 05/26/2013 04:19 PM, atomlin@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
>
> Since v1:
> - Removed unnecessary parentheses
>
> ---8<---
>
> Failed GFP_ATOMIC allocations by the network stack result in dropped
> packets, which will be received on a subsequent retransmit, and an
> unnecessary, noisy warning with a kernel backtrace.
>
> These warnings are harmless, but they still cause users to panic and
> file bug reports over dropped packets. It would be better to hide the
> failed allocation warnings and backtraces, and let retransmits handle
> dropped packets quietly.
Yes please. Getting memory management bug reports for
dropped network packets got old years ago. Lets get
rid of those messages.
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists