[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369691406.3557.35.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:50:06 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
andrew@...n.ch, jason@...edaemon.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, buytenh@...tstofly.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: kirkwood: proper retain MAC address workaround
on DT ethernet
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
> > though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use
> > the current allocation if the new content is of smaller or equal size.
>
> I thought that dtc tried to aggressively save space by folding identical
> strings. If you tried to reuse a property that had its contents shared
> with another one, you would get interesting results I guess.
It used to be only property names, unless that has changed in recent
dtc. But that's a good point, we probably want a flag in struct property
like we have for nodes, indicating whether it comes from the original
fdt data pool or not.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists