[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369691284.3557.34.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:48:04 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, buytenh@...tstofly.org,
jason@...edaemon.net, andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: kirkwood: proper retain MAC address workaround
on DT ethernet
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:50:04 +1000
>
> > It would be handy to be able to just do something like
> >
> > of_set_property(node, name, ptr, len);
> >
> > However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
> > though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use
> > the current allocation if the new content is of smaller or equal size.
>
> And this is so much better of an interface because it allows the
> OF implementation to decide how to deal with memory allocation
> and freeing.
Absolutely, I'm not arguing that point.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists