[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51A60263.4020404@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:28:03 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, pjt@...gle.com
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/8]: use runnable load avg in balance
On 05/28/2013 09:31 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> > Tested the latest patch set (new 3/8 and 6/8) with pgbench, tip
>> > 3.10.0-rc1 and 12 cpu X86 box, works well and still benefit ;-)
>
> Paul:
>
> Would you like to give more comments/ideas of this patch set?
Peter,
If no more idea of the blocked_load_avg usages, could we have the
patchset clobbered in tip tree? Any way we get better performance on
hackbench/pgbench/cgroup stress etc benchmarks.
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists