[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369846845.6121.6.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:00:45 -0700
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, jason.low2@...com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch v6 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 23:17 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> blocked_load_avg sometime is too heavy and far bigger than runnable load
> avg. that make balance make wrong decision. So better don't consider it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Hi Alex,
I have been testing these patches with a Java server workload on an 8
socket (80 core) box with Hyperthreading enabled, and I have been seeing
good results with these patches.
When using a 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with patches 1-8, there was about a 40%
improvement in performance of the workload compared to when using the
vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel with no patches. When using a 3.10-rc2 tip
kernel with just patches 1-7, the performance improvement of the
workload over the vanilla 3.10-rc2 tip kernel was about 25%.
Tested-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Thanks,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists