lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 29 May 2013 23:07:47 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@...com>
CC:	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"lance_ortiz@...mail.com" <lance_ortiz@...mail.com>,
	"jiang.liu@...wei.com" <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"mchehab@...hat.com" <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] aerdrv: Move cper_print_aer() call out of interrupt
 context

> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: This function needs to be re-written so that it's output
> +	 * matches the output of aer_print_error().  Right now, the output
> +	 * is formatted very differently.
> +	 */

So we have this big "TODO" comment sitting there very prominently ... which Linus
is bound to ask about if I ask him to pull this into 3.10-rcX ... what's the impact of
this?  What should I say when he asks why should he pull this fix into 3.10 when
there is still some work to do?  Is matching the output no big deal and can wait for
some future, while moving the pci bits to the work function needs to go in now?

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ