linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: map_init_section flushes incorrect pmd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANutaR_ZHWdXQrZNBN91K==n3taMKBptmyU0+8DT1RzBStNCyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 May 2013 19:33:57 +0800
From:	Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Sricharan R <r.sricharan@...com>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: map_init_section flushes incorrect pmd

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:15:26AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Will,
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Po-Yu Chuang wrote:
>> >>> Will,
>> >>> I guess nobody noticed this because the MMU of later v7 processors
>> >>> fetches page table
>> >>> from D-cache. It even doesn't need to clean pmd to PoU.
>> >>
>> >> It does if it's UP. The walker is only guaranteed to read from L1 if you
>> >> have the multiprocessing extensions.
>> >
>> > Ya, I see.
>> >>
>> >> As for this function, looks like it's ok because it has precisely one
>> >> caller, so it might be worth prefixing it with some underscores to make it
>> >> clear that nobody else should be calling it!
>> >
>> > I am fine with that.
>> > Should I create a new patch?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone have more comment about this?
Hi Will,

> Sorry, I was snowed under yesterday. If you fancy adding the underscores to
> __map_init_section, that would help preserve what little remains of my
> sanity.

Although I recognize each word above, I am not quite sure what do you mean. :-p
I assume that the sentences mean you prefer adding underscores, so I
will submit a new patch.

>
> Your existing patch looks technically correct.

Regards,
Po-Yu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/