[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3808365.SOUxDqkW9J@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:04:01 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] video: xilinxfb: Do not use out_be32 IO function
On Thursday 30 May 2013 11:41:01 Michal Simek wrote:
> * To perform the read/write on the registers we need to check on
> * which bus its connected and call the appropriate write API.
> */
> -static void xilinx_fb_out_be32(struct xilinxfb_drvdata *drvdata, u32 offset,
> +static void xilinx_fb_out32(struct xilinxfb_drvdata *drvdata, u32 offset,
> u32 val)
> {
> if (drvdata->flags & PLB_ACCESS_FLAG)
> - out_be32(drvdata->regs + (offset << 2), val);
> + __raw_writel(val, drvdata->regs + (offset << 2));
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_DCR
> else
> dcr_write(drvdata->dcr_host, offset, val);
>
This is probably missing barriers, and is wrong on systems on which
the endianess of the device is different from the CPU.
You already have an indirection in there, so I guess it won't hurt
to create a third case for little-endian registers and add
another bit in drvdata->flags, or make it depend on the architecture,
if the endianess of the device registers is known at compile time.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists