[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130531101940.GC32728@e103034-lin>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:19:40 +0100
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"efault@....de" <efault@....de>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Changlong Xie <changlongx.xie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v7 7/8] sched: consider runnable load average in
move_tasks
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:02:03AM +0100, Alex Shi wrote:
> Except using runnable load average in background, move_tasks is also
> the key functions in load balance. We need consider the runnable load
> average in it in order to the apple to apple load comparison.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index eadd2e7..bb2470a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4178,11 +4178,11 @@ static int tg_load_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> long cpu = (long)data;
>
> if (!tg->parent) {
> - load = cpu_rq(cpu)->load.weight;
> + load = cpu_rq(cpu)->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> } else {
> load = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->h_load;
> - load *= tg->se[cpu]->load.weight;
> - load /= tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->load.weight + 1;
> + load *= tg->se[cpu]->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> + load /= tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->runnable_load_avg + 1;
runnable_load_avg is u64, so you need to use div_u64() similar to how it
is already done in task_h_load() further down in this patch. It doesn't
build on ARM as is.
Fix:
- load /= tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->runnable_load_avg + 1;
+ load = div_u64(load,
tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->runnable_load_avg + 1);
Morten
> }
>
> tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->h_load = load;
> @@ -4210,8 +4210,8 @@ static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
> unsigned long load;
>
> - load = p->se.load.weight;
> - load = div_u64(load * cfs_rq->h_load, cfs_rq->load.weight + 1);
> + load = p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib;
> + load = div_u64(load * cfs_rq->h_load, cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg + 1);
>
> return load;
> }
> --
> 1.7.12
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists