[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51ADAE78.4050900@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:38:08 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"ian@...mlogic.co.uk" <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10
Hi,
On Sunday 02 June 2013 02:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:33:10AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Sunday 02 June 2013 12:15 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> No, that makes no sense at all to me. Why do you think this maps onto
>>> the set mode API? Modes are all about accuracy of regulation.
>
>> I mapped this to the regulation under different load, Fast mode is
>> in heavy load and so boost enable, normal/idle mode for normal load
>> and so bypass.
>
> This is still not making any sense. The quality of regulation and
> output voltage are essentially orthogonal, and obviously there's a
> specific API for bypass which is something different again to both
> mode and output voltage selection.
Do you recommend adding API's (similar to bypass) for BOOST and SWITCH?
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists