[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130604093816.GY31367@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 10:38:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"ian@...mlogic.co.uk" <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] regulator: palmas: enable all modes for SMPS10
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:38:08PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Sunday 02 June 2013 02:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >This is still not making any sense. The quality of regulation and
> >output voltage are essentially orthogonal, and obviously there's a
> >specific API for bypass which is something different again to both
> >mode and output voltage selection.
> Do you recommend adding API's (similar to bypass) for BOOST and SWITCH?
No. A boost regulator is still a voltage regulator, it just happens to
raise rather than lower the voltage but it's otherwise a normal
regulator. I'm not sure what you mean by "SWITCH" - from the name it'd
just be a bypass?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists