[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AE2EDF.3000505@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:15:59 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, bp@...en8.de,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net, tomoki.sekiyama@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/3] trace,x86: Add irq vector tracepoints
On 06/03/2013 04:53 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> This way we wont be opening up any easy root holes where if a process
> finds a way to modify some arbitrary kernel memory, we can prevent it
> from modifying the current_idt_descr_ptr and have a nice way to exploit
> the IDT. Sure, one can argue that if they can modify arbitrary kernel
> memory, we may already be lost, but lets not make it easier for them
> than need be.
>
I don't like current_idt_descr_ptr if we can avoid it. It is a direct
proxy for reading and writing the original IDT, in other words, it
really hasn't really addressed the issue.
What I'm thinking we really should have is a function that returns the
IDT that we currently should be using, based on the current state. If
that state is, say, tracing on/off and NMI on/off, then that can be
indicated by bits in a state vector.
The point is that the IDT address itself should not be mutable state if
it can be at all avoided.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists