[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130605111544.GA8923@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:15:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: code refine in unthrottle_cfs_rq()
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:23:39PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> Directly use rq to save some code.
>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Please send patches against tip/master; the below didn't apply cleanly.
It was a trivial conflict so I applied force and made it fit.
Thanks!
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c61a614..1e10911 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> int enqueue = 1;
> long task_delta;
>
> - se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
> + se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
>
> cfs_rq->throttled = 0;
> raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists