[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130606153030.GA19876@ab42.lan>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:30:31 +0200
From: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Sascha Leuenberger <sascha.leuenberger@...lis.com>,
Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@...lis.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinmux: Add TB10x pinmux driver
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:32:21PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On 6 June 2013 22:11, Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:44:27AM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> >> On 3 June 2013 20:30, Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com> wrote:
> >> > OK, here's a simplified example of what we would like to do (this seems
> >> > pretty common so I suppose there is a way I haven't understood). Our
> >> > situation is slightly more complex but for the purpose of discussion
> >> > let's assume a chip with 8 pins which can be configured for the
> >> > following functions:
> >> >
> >> > Pin GPIO-A I2C SPI0 SPI1
> >> > ------------------------------------
> >> > 1 GPIOA0 SDA MISO1
> >> > 2 GPIOA1 SCL MOSI1
> >> > 3 GPIOA2 SS1_B
> >> > 4 GPIOA3 SCLK1
> >> > 5 GPIOA4 MISO0
> >> > 6 GPIOA5 MOSI0
> >> > 7 GPIOA6 SS0_B
> >> > 8 GPIOA7 SCLK0
> >> >
> >> > We can now define the following pinctrl-single:
> >> >
> >> > pinmux: pinmux@...FEE0000 {
> >> > compatible = "pinctrl-single";
> >> > reg = <0xFFEE0000 0x8>;
> >> > #address-cells = <1>;
> >> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >> > #gpio-range-cells = <3>;
> >> > pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>;
> >> > pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0xffffffff>;
> >> > pinctrl-single,gpio-range = <&range 1 8 0>;
> >> > gpioa_pins: pinmux_gpioa_pins {
> >> > pinctrl-single,pins = <0x0 0 0x4 0>
> >> > };
> >> > i2c_pins: pinmux_i2c_pins {
> >> > pinctrl-single,pins = <0x0 1>
> >> > };
> >> > spi0_pins: pinmux_spi0_pins {
> >> > pinctrl-single,pins = <0x1 1>
> >> <0x1 1>?
> >>
> >> If each pinmux register is only for one pin in your SoC.
> >> I think that your definitions are wrong above. We use
> >> register offset as the first argument, not pin number.
> >> And the second argument should be pin function number.
> >
> > In our case each pinmux register (bit field) actually controls an entire
> > group of pins.
> >
> >> If multiple pins are sharing one register with different bits,
> >> you need to enable "pinctrl-single,bit-per-mux".
> >
> > Multiple pins are sharing the same bits in the same register. Do you
> > think this prevents us from using pinctrl-single?
> >
> Could you give me your register definition? Then I can understand you
> better.
In our example, the register map would look a bit like the following.
Note that every register configures four pins at a time.
Register 0x0:
Mode GPIO-A I2C SPI1
Value 0x0 0x1 0x2
---------------------------
Pin1 GPIOA0 SDA MISO1
Pin2 GPIOA1 SCL MOSI1
Pin3 GPIOA2 SS1_B
Pin4 GPIOA3 SCLK1
Register 0x4:
Mode GPIO-A SPI0
Value 0x0 0x1
---------------------
Pin5 GPIOA4 MISO0
Pin6 GPIOA5 MOSI0
Pin7 GPIOA6 SS0_B
Pin8 GPIOA7 SCLK0
Greetings,
Christian
--
Christian Ruppert , <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
/|
Tel: +41/(0)22 816 19-42 //| 3, Chemin du Pré-Fleuri
_// | bilis Systems CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists