[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:27:17 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
Linux EFI <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> kexec seems like a lower priority than compatibility. Perhaps keep the
> efi argument for people who want to use kexec?
This is what I currently have in the code: if you boot with efi=1:1_map,
you get them.
> hpa suggested allocating a fixed high area for UEFI mappings, which
> would also solve this.
I guess we can do that too.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists