linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Jun 2013 21:30:57 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Linux EFI <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter

On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > kexec seems like a lower priority than compatibility. Perhaps keep the
> > efi argument for people who want to use kexec?
> 
> This is what I currently have in the code: if you boot with efi=1:1_map,
> you get them.

Well, we want the 1:1 mappings to exist all the time. The only thing the 
option should change is whether they're passed to SetVirtualAddressMap() 
or not.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/