[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfwSTO7UoEGVpd7qdFVSFNYrBG6aXx1Oj8UAkgbmi=1XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:19:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@...lis.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Pierrick Hascoet <pierrick.hascoet@...lis.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] i2c: designware: fix race between subsequent xfers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Christian Ruppert
<christian.ruppert@...lis.com> wrote:
> The designware block is not always properly disabled in the case of
> transfer errors. Interrupts from aborted transfers might be handled
> after the data structures for the following transfer are initialised but
> before the hardware is set up. This can corrupt the data structures to
> the point that the system is stuck in an infinite interrupt loop (where
> FIFOs are never emptied because dev->msg_read_idx == dev->msgs_num).
>
> This patch cleanly disables the designware-i2c hardware at the end of
> every transfer, be it successful or not.
>
> This patch requires https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2601241/ to be
> applied first.
What if you just move disabling code from i2c_dw_xfer_init() to the
top of i2c_dw_xfer() ?
Will it help?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists