linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] per-cgroup cpu-stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130607000637.GT5045@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:06:37 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] per-cgroup cpu-stat

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> I am coming again with this series, hoping this is a better time for you all to
> look at it.
> 
> I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it
> deserves a special discussion (even though my position in this matter is widely
> known), but all the infrastructure to make it happen is here. But after this,
> it should be a matter of setting a flag (or not).

Things look generally good to me upto patch 6.  Maybe we can combine
"adding cpuacct stats to cpu" and "re-using schedstats" but no strong
opinion.  Peter, what do you think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/